Skip to main content

Triaging and Prioritizing Bugs in SimplerQMS

This is being shared with customers for visibility, but it is an internal process of the SimplerQMS team.

Updated over 3 weeks ago

Make sure every issue reported is assessed consistently, assigned the right urgency, and moved forward with clear ownership and next steps—without creating unnecessary interruptions.

Why triage problems?

  • Not all issues require immediate action

  • Interruptions are costly

  • Misplaced urgency leads to poor decisions

Criticality

What it means

Typical examples

Where to report

What happens next

Urgent

Service-blocking issue needing immediate attention. We need to fix it now

Users cannot access the system, widespread outage, critical workflow completely blocked.

Support Channel (SimplerQMS Only)

You wake up an engineer from the product team. 🚨

Bug

Something is broken but not necessarily system-wide or fully blocking for everyone. It can wait until Monday.

Feature doesn’t behave as expected, errors in a specific flow, broken UI elements affecting use.

SimplerQMS Only

PM/Eng triage, prioritize, schedule fix; link to customer cases if relevant.

Improvement

Enhancement ideas, usability tweaks, or feature requests. We’ll prioritize it in the roadmap

Better filters, small workflow optimizations, new optional capabilities.

Added to feedback pool, reviewed in product discovery and planning.

Bug Priority Levels

The product team assigns priority to incoming bugs:

Priority

Definition

Examples

Urgent

Service-blocking issue needing immediate attention

System outage; workflows blocked (e.g., “can’t approve”)

High

Major functionality broken with significant customer/regulatory impact

Archived CR action appears as open in a CR

Medium

Non-critical functionality broken with moderate user impact, no regulatory impact

Frequent logouts; can’t save views

Low

Minor issue with minimal impact

Cosmetic UI issues; copy errors

Did this answer your question?